Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RainMaker
Interesting story, David. I will give this some mulling as I am the one in my company who has to put together the presentation to be used in the field. I have developed one that works fairly well for me, but this story has definitely got me thinking. Also to the extent that I have tested it (with one salesman using it), he does not seem to be getting the same result it brings me.
|
RM. Mm You have given me an idea to try out for myself before I make it a definite suggestion for you to take up. Let me bounce this off your wall 1st.
Imagine that we are responsible for developing a canned presentation. Imagine we've trialed it and it works
for us, but it doesn't work quite as well for others.
It could be that it works well for us because we developed it, we understand it, we've reheresed it, it repesents who we are, it's developed in our style and uses our predominant mode of communication ( visual, linguistic, sensory etc )
and above all we feel we have ownership of it. It's our baby!.
It could be that it doesn't work well for others because they don't understand the reason for doing it our way, it's out of synch with their natural mode of communication, they didn't develop it, it's not
their way and above all no matter how often they are forced to reherse it they're never going to deliver it with a passion.
Can we change that?
Suppose we strip away the components of the presentation until we get down to the basic message. The What are we trying to say and why are we trying to say it?
Now suppose we say to the salesperson who's struggled with our original canned presentation...
- This is the basic message xyz
- Put it into your own words
- Build me a simple presentation with no words (spoken or written) which will convey the same message.
- Next, put the two together and find a way to get some form of partisipation from the listener.
- Build in questions that will get the listener involved, thinking on your wave length about the common problems for which you have a solution.
Now ... giving a sales person a canned presentation is a bit like giving a hungry man a fish.
Teaching a sales person how to develop his own canned presentation is a bit like, teaching a hungry man how to fish.
Is it better to do his thinking for him or help him to develop his thinking for himself.
It's a similar thought to...
Is it better to tell the customer what to buy from you or is it better to develop his thinking so that he is willing to tell you what he wants to buy from you.
I'm beginning to think that a canned presenation should be a presentation that a salesperson has developed for themselves, that suits their style, that they have ownership of, that they can roll out in the blink of an eye anywhere at any time and still have it deliver the same message for the same reason as your own/ different style presentation.
The idea that it is canned should mean that it is always the same, or a least very similar, well rehersed, honed and polished every time that sales person uses it.
It's canned by them, not by others.
Like you said... making every word count and making the most of the short time that the listener is prepared to give you.
"Canned" should not mean one sales script dreampt up by one individual for unerring use by all.
Different strokes suit different folks but different strokes can also achieve the same results if not better!
So my new thoughts are that it doesn't matter how we communicate the message so long as we communicate the same message,
professionally.
So now I'm going to encourage my sales people to develop their own canned presentation to deliver
my basic selling message but in their own professional style.
It's just a guess but I'm starting to believe that the importance of my role is to get the fundamental message right, to make it clear and to get others to reinforce the message in their own unique style with added passion.
Mmm what do think rain maker? I am I getting warm?
dave bowen