Quote:
I tend to agree with most of that although "close the deal", like so many other references to closing. hardly describes how you do that.
One of the things that is seldom discussed here, and is often discussed among really successful salespeople, is the "taking ownership" factor in selling. I believe that is probably the definitive answer to Harold's original question. A successful sales process leads to that event, but it is an act of volition by the buyer as a result of the seller's fine efforts. "Assuming the sale" as it is popularly talked about (as a close), is usually weak, counterproductive, and transparent. That is not in reference, BTW, to Mr. Charisma's use of the term. Certainly one can assume the sale when there is evidence that the buyer is in the process of assuming ownership. It is not things like body language that we look for, it is a shift in conversation by the buyer that shows that he/she has assumed the ownership in his/her mind.
From my experience and research, this paragraph above not only illuminates the psychology of sales but reveals where the core motivation in communication itself resides.
Assuming ownership is a state of "being" that the seasoned sales rep is looking for beneath the verbal and body languages. For these "languages" are observables that function only as catalysts, along with the immediate environment, to develop a single holistic hidden process called communication.
What is our relationship with a shopping cart when meandering through the isles of our local store? What would happen if someone accidentally grabbed your cart: you would bring this to the attention of the "criminal" and he or she would relinquish
your possession with humble apologies. So, now
you not only expressed ownership but the
transgressor agrees!
In this scenario, you assume ownership of that cart and its contents even if it is temporary. Yet, the cart belongs to the store and you have not paid for the food. So, what do you own? How can you claim the cart is yours? Yes, you were using it but that (use) is not what gives you the power to demand possession. It is the motivation linked to the innate capacity"ownership."
What would happen if you were at a local convenience store and placed a Coke on the counter and someone behind you reached out grabbed it for themselves? Everyone in the line including the clerk, would demand that it be returned because of the mental state of "
assumption of ownership" which we all feel. And, you were not using the can.
The actual transfer of the object in sales, is only a token indicator of a prior state of mind. That is why the assumptive sale approach can work with
some prospects as it signals to the customer the
relinquishment of ownership paving the way for the customer to
assume ownership.
-John Voris
In my opinion, the simplest answer, though maybe not the most complete, is that you should attempt to seek agreement with your client all along your discovery/presentation on whether your product or service is an appropriate fit/solution for your client based upon what you've uncovered during your explorations with your client.
Aloha... :cool: -rattus58