Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MitchM
He didn't want it on the first call, Skip. I asked him directly if he could commit - along with other questions of commitment- and he said no. Maybe I didn't make that clear in my posts - if not then I'm at fault for the misunderstanding.
He could have gone elsewhere. I was willing to let him go elsewhere. I didn't believe he would as he wasn't willing to commit to anything definitely and I wasn't willing to try and get him to commit.
"How is not selling someone on a first call superior to selling someone one the first call if all other things are equal (customer satisfaction, etc.)?" -- Skip
It's not a matter of superior or inferior. He didn't want it on the first call. Here's a question for you, Skip: what would you have done to make the sales on the first call?
MitchM
|
Obviously, I wasn't there, so I have very limited knowledge of the situation, so I don't know exactly what I'd do. But a couple concepts do come to mind:
1. Developing rapport. (I know you have spoken out against developing rapport a number of times in this forum, but how can anybody be against developing rapport with a prospect?)
[definition: rapport: "Relationship, especially one of mutual trust or emotional affinity"
2. Engage the prospect instead of disengaging the prospect. (I know you have posted on the importance of disengaging)
3. Handle objections instead of not handling objections (I'm believe you've posted often that you don't believe in handling objections).
4. Identify the prospects buying motivations (needs and desires).
Those are just some generalities. Now, if you did those things and the prospect wasn't interested, then fine, let him go. But if you didn't do those things, and if you don't do those things, then I can guarantee you that you are missing opportunities with your prospects.
Skip