In any conversation when the other person objects to anything - price, ingredients, the business of network marketing - by that I mean makes a statement indicating a question that might be interpreted as negative or argumentative or one of resistance - I ask quesitions to clarify the questions BUT wanting to second guess or assume the reason behind the question.
As long as the questions are answered honestly and the conversation is clear and moving in an intelligent and thoughtful direction it continues. BUT when my questions are met with negative answers, resistance or vague and incomplete answers - that indicates someone who really doesn't want to continue the dialogue - I'll end it.
After reading many books on overcoming objections and using different approaches and systems to do that I threw most of it away because I didn't like that way of doing business, fred. Obviously I ask and answer questions out of a genuine desire to move forward - "Fred, if the answer is satisfactoy will you want_____________?" BUT, if the answers are objections and resistance that I hear as argumentative, I end the conversation.
So what I'm labeling as Objections and Resistance are really what I decide are argumentative, negative statements or questions.
Jacque Werth's "High Probibility Selling" has been a great help to me.
MitchM