People like to speculate and come up with so called credentials and experience to make a point or call a question - that's fairly common as we all have our opinions. But who is going to rise to occasion or not is an unknown.
Sara Palin has served as a city council member, a mayor, and Governor of Alaska for twenty months - those are credentials. They are not lengthy credentials and AZBROKER calls them minor league - of course he can have that opinion.
Here's an analogy - I once sponsored a man into our business and he had what looked like all the qualities and skills to become very successful. But he blew it. He was a poor student of our business and his ego got in the way of everything he did.
On the other hand an unlikely woman with no experience who would have been last on anyone's prospecting list has over and over again arose to the occasion and is successful.
Obviously you look for credentials and experience when you vote - then you turn inward and some kind of value system you've come to internalize takes over. Then some emotions turn on and the day comes and it's time to cast a vote.
BUT is that obvious? What are people voting on and for? Do deep thoughts of discernment cast the vote? What biases do we cherish?
I am one of the few people I know who understands all of that and will vote for all the right reasons and whether you agree with me or not I will still leave the light on for you when you arrive.
MitchM